
Spain
Current economic situation
Programme overview
Programme Timeline
2008
Housing bubble and construction boom
Bubble bursts; banks suffer loan losses; economic recession
Spanish government starts bank restructuring
Bank restructuring completed
Spain achieves 3.2% economic growth
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
ESM programme outcomes
Addressing a crisis fuelled by the financial sector
Bank-specific measures:
- Identifying bank capital needs through asset quality review and stress-test;
- Bank recapitalisation and restructuring;
- Segregation and transfer of impaired assets to SAREB (asset management company).
Sector-wide measures to strengthen the banking sector as a whole, including:
- Higher capital requirements;
- Improved bank governance rules;
- Upgraded reporting requirements;
- Strengthened financial regulation and supervision.
Thanks to the implementation of measures specified in the programme, Spain’s banking sector was stabilised and consolidated. Banks strengthened their capital base and access to funding. Restoring the viability of the banking sector was a crucial element in Spain’s overall economic recovery. The country returned to economic growth in 2014, with positive developments in the areas of competitiveness, employment, and current account balance. These positive developments lasted until the pandemic crisis affected the European and global economy in 2020.
After the programme
Between 2014 and 2018, Spain made a series of early repayments of its ESM loans, amounting to €17.6 billion.
ESM country team coordinator for
Spain: Marialena Athanasopoulou
Facts
€41.3 bn
8
12.5 years
Details of ESM financial assistance for Spain
Date of disbursement | Amount disbursed | Type of disbursement | Final maturity | Cumulative amount disbursed |
---|---|---|---|---|
11/12/2012 | €39.468 billion | Cashless | 11/12/2027 * | €39.468 billion |
05/02/2013 | €1.865 billion | Cashless | 11/12/2025 ** | €41.333 billion |
Weighted average maturity of loans: 12.49 years
*Constant amortisation between 2022 and 2027 of €4.143 billion per year (amount adjusted following loan prepayments).
**Constant amortisation between 2024 and 2025 of €933 million per year.
Details of the notes provided by ESM
ISIN | Issuance date | Maturity | Type | Amount |
---|---|---|---|---|
EU000A1U98X6 | 01/02/2013 | 05/08/2015 | 30-month FRN | €1.865 billion |
EU000A1U97C2 | 05/12/2012 | 11/02/2013 | 2-month Bill | €2.5 billion |
EU000A1U97D0 | 05/12/2012 | 11/10/2013 | 10-month Bill | €6.468 billion |
EU000A1U98U2 | 05/12/2012 | 11/06/2014 | 18-month FRN | €6.5 billion |
EU000A1U98V0 | 05/12/2012 | 11/12/2014 | 2-year FRN | €12 billion |
EU000A1U98W8 | 05/12/2012 | 11/12/2015 | 3-year FRN | €12 billion |
Loan repayments
Date of repayment | Amount repaid | Cumulative amount repaid | Details |
---|---|---|---|
08/07/2014 | €1.304 billion | €1.304 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
23/07/2014 | €0.308 billion | €1.612 billion | Scheduled repayment of unused funds |
17/03/2015 | €1.5 billion | €3.112 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
14/07/2015 | €2.5 billion | €5.612 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
11/11/2016 | €1 billion | €6.612 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
14/06/2017 | €1 billion | €7.612 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
16/11/2017 | €2 billion | €9.612 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
23/02/2018 | €2 billion | €11.612 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
23/05/2018 | €3 billion | €14.612 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
16/10/2018 | €3 billion | €17.612 billion | Early repayment (voluntary) |
12/12/2022 | €3.643 billion | €21.255 billion | Scheduled repayment |
11/12/2023 | €3.643 billion | €24.898 billion | Scheduled repayment |
11/12/2024 | €4.575 billion | €29.473 billion | Scheduled repayment |
Related documents
Legal documents
- Financial Assistance Facility Agreement (PDF, 125 KB)
Review documents published by the European Commission
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2022
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Autumn 2021
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2021
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Autumn 2020
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2020
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Autumn 2019; Statement by EC and ECB, 10/10/2019
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2019; Statement by EC and ECB, 10/05/2019
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Autumn 2018; Statement by EC and ECB, 09/10/2018
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2018; Statement by EC and ECB, 16/04/2018
- Post-programme Surveillance Report. Autumn 2017; Statement by EC and ECB, 23/10/2017
- Post-programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2017; Statement by EC and ECB, 28/04/2017
- Post-Programme Surveillance Report. Autumn 2016; Statement by EC and ECB, 24/10/2016
- Post-Programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2016; Statement by EC and ECB, 18/04/2016
- Evaluation of the Financial Sector Assistance Programme. Spain, 2012-2014 (Dec. 2015)
- Post-Programme Surveillance Report, Autumn 2015; Statement by EC and ECB, 12/10/2015
- Post-Programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2015; Statement by EC and ECB, 23/03/2015
- Post Programme Surveillance Report, Autumn 2014; Statement by EC and ECB, 13/10/2014
- Post Programme Surveillance Report, Spring 2014; Statement by EC and ECB, 04/04/2014
- Fifth Review – Winter 2014; Statement by EC and ECB, 16/12/2013
- Fourth Review – Autumn 2013; Statement by EC and ECB, 30/09/2013
- Third Review– Summer 2013; Statement by EC and ECB, 03/06/2013
- Second Review – Spring 2013; Statement by EC and ECB, 04/02/2013
- First review - Autumn 2012; Statement by EC and ECB, 26/10/2012
- The Financial Sector Adjustment Programme for Spain (October 2012)
Explainer
How did the ESM financial assistance help Spain?
ESM assistance was key in cleaning the balance sheets of troubled banks, improving their capital base, and overcoming market fears about the depth of the problems in Spain’s financial sector.
When will Spain have to repay the loans?
Spain was scheduled to repay the loan principal from 2022 to 2027. However, starting in July 2014, the Spanish government made the first in a series of early repayments to the ESM. To date, Spain has repaid €29.5 billion (out of the total loan amount of €41.3 billion).

Was the IMF involved in the financial assistance for Spain?
No, the IMF did not make a financial contribution because unlike the ESM, it does not have a financial assistance tool related to bank recapitalisation. The IMF was only involved in an advisory and monitoring capacity.
Were these capital injections in banks compatible with state aid rules?
Yes, the European Commission was closely involved in the bank recapitalisation process and approved the state aid for the recapitalisation of the banks concerned.
What were the conditions attached to the financial assistance?
In the case of Spain, conditions were strictly directed to the banking sector. There were three main conditions: first, identifying individual bank capital needs through an asset quality review of the banking sector and a bank-by-bank stress test. Second, recapitalising and restructuring weak banks based on plans to address any capital shortfalls identified in the stress test. Finally, problematic assets in those banks receiving public support (without any credible plans to address their capital shortfalls by private means) were to be segregated and transferred to an external asset management company (Sociedad de Gestión de Activos Procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria – SAREB).
In addition, conditionality was also applied in order to strengthen the banking sector as a whole. This included regulatory capital targets, bank governance rules, an upgrade of reporting requirements and improved supervisory procedures.
How much financial assistance did the ESM provide to Spain?
In June 2012, the Spanish government made an official request for financial assistance for its banking system to the Eurogroup for a loan of up to €100 billion. It was designed to cover a capital shortfall identified in a number of Spanish banks, with an additional safety margin.
In December 2012, the Spanish government formally requested the disbursement of €39.47 billion via a dedicated ESM loan for the recapitalisation of the banking sector. The funds were transferred in the form of ESM notes on 11 December 2012 to the Fondo de Restructuración Ordenada Bancaria (FROB), the bank recapitalisation fund of the Spanish government. The FROB used these notes for the recapitalisation, in an amount close to €37 billion, of the following banks: BFA-Bankia, Catalunya-Caixa, NCG Banco and Banco de Valencia. Additionally the FROB was to provide up to €2.5 billion to SAREB, the asset management company for assets arising from bank restructuring.
In January 2013, the Spanish government formally requested the disbursement of €1.86 billion for the recapitalisation of the following banks: Banco Mare Nostrum, Banco Ceiss, Caja 3 and Liberbank. The funds were transferred to the FROB in the form of ESM notes on 5 February 2013.
No further requests for disbursement were made, thus the overall amount of financial assistance provided by the ESM to Spain was €41.33 billion. This was the only instance so far when the ESM indirect recapitalisation loan was used.
Why did Spain need financial assistance?
The disproportionate growth in the real estate sector, along with the expansion of credit to finance it, were the main reasons behind Spain’s economic imbalances. In the real estate sector, a spiral of growth in demand, prices and supply caused a major bubble, which burst when the impact of the international financial crisis was felt in Spain. The massive scale of loans for construction and property development caused an excessive exposure of the banking industry to those sectors. In particular, Spain’s savings banks (Cajas de Ahorros) were affected by solvency problems.
A restructuring process was started by the Spanish authorities in 2010. However, the economic downturn turned out deeper and longer than expected. The funding costs for Spain as well as Spanish banks significantly increased. These market conditions raised widespread concern that private and public resources would be insufficient to support the banking system with capital.